Newsnight Editors Think Description of Jeremy Corbyn as “Hard Left” is Fair and Accurate!

Last autumn we wrote to the BBC to complain about Newsnight’s Emily Maitlis using the term “hard left” three times in one programme to refer to a sector of the Labour Party. On one occasion she explicitly identified Jeremy Corbyn as a member of the “hard left”.

Thousands of you supported our complaint on social media with shares and comments.

We have now received a response from the BBC and warn you in advance that it is likely to raise your blood pressure! According to the BBC, “‘hard left’ was used to simply indicate where it is generally perceived those opposed to the proposals (from Keir Starmer) are on the political spectrum”. This was, according to the BBC, “a fair reflection on the tensions within the Labour Party”.

The BBC insist that “your concerns have been seen by senior Newsnight editors”. Does this imply that Newsnight’s top editors believe that it is fair and accurate to describe Jeremy Corbyn as “hard left”!?

We disagree and decided to escalate our complaint to the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit…

Updated Complaint

The BBC’s response. Since our initial complaint highlights that the “hard left” description is applied to Jeremy Corbyn, we can only infer that the BBC believe “hard left” is an accurate indication of where Corbyn (and other Labour MPs who opposed Starmer’s attack on the one member, one vote electoral system) are positioned on the political spectrum

We write to escalate our complaint (reference number: CAS-6929802-S8Q0J4) on Emily Maitlis’s use of the term “hard-left” to describe sectors of the Labour Party.

In our initial complaint we highlighted that this is a non-impartial use of language and supported this assertion with evidence. We repeat the evidence here – “Condemnation by label is a favourite tactic of political antagonism … Descriptions like ‘hard left’, ‘far left’, ‘extreme left’ and ‘extreme right’ all have extra connotations, political under-meanings to damage the people they describe” (Wilson, John (1996). Understanding Journalism: A Guide to Issues. Psychology Press. p. 203)

We also repeat our assertion that non-neutral commentators like Nigel Farage regularly use the term. Farage, for example, has branded the SNP “an extreme hard left party”. The term’s utility to commentators like Farage is clear – describing someone’s politics as “hard” makes them appear frightening, unreasonable, set in their ways. Use of such a loaded term by the BBC cannot, therefore, be seen as impartial.

Following the response to our initial complaint, we also need to complain about accuracy. The response from the BBC’s Complaint Unit, following consultation with “senior Newsnight editors”, was that “‘hard left’ was used to simply indicate where it is generally perceived those opposed to the proposals are on the political spectrum.”

Since Emily Maitlis directly linked one of the “hard left” descriptions to Jeremy Corbyn, it follows that the BBC consider it accurate to describe Corbyn’s political position as “hard left”.

Is this, in fact, accurate? Jeremy Corbyn was leader of the Labour Party, generally considered a party of the “centre-left”, for a period of five years, and won two internal leadership elections (through democratic vote from party members) to obtain this position. Corbyn is one of the longest-serving British parliamentarians, having been MP for Islington North since 1983. Is Islington North a radical area that elects candidates (nine times in a row!) that occupy “hard” or “extreme” positions on the political spectrum? Do the BBC consider it so?

Moreover, as well as being one of the longest-serving parliamentarians, Jeremy Corbyn continually expresses his belief in parliamentary democracy – e.g. “We live in a democracy and the government has to be accountable to parliament”. This distances Corbyn from actual “hard left” positions such as anarchism (no leaders) and Marxist Communism (one party control).

The BBC must, as a priority, admit to an error in the use of “hard left” to describe Mr Corbyn and other democratic socialists in the Labour Party or clarify on what basis this judgement is considered “accurate” and “impartial”.

Conclusion

How will the BBC respond this time?

We suspect they are uncomfortable with this complaint. Indeed, they have already violated their own procedures when dealing with it. As you can see, the response we received did not offer us a right of reply or indicate how we could escalate our complaint, if dissatisfied. Were the BBC hoping we’d just go away!?

If you’d like to help us pile the pressure on the BBC please share this article on social media and copy in @bbcnews and Newsnight handles. Avowedly “neutral” journalists and outlets must be held to account when they attempt to tarnish the left!

What did you make of the BBC’s response? Please let us know in the comments! You can also enter your e-mail in the box below to receive a monthly Free Press update direct to your mailbox

Processing…
Success! You're on the list. You can unsubcribe by clicking the link in any Free Press e-mail

5 thoughts on “Newsnight Editors Think Description of Jeremy Corbyn as “Hard Left” is Fair and Accurate!

  1. The BBC clearly decided to join with the rest of the British news-media, the Zionist right-wing of the Labour Party and certain other right wing organisations such as the British Board of Deputies, in depicting Jeremy Corbyn as being an anti-Semite, a terrorist supporter and a political outsider when it became clear that he was the most likely Labour leader to win a general election for his Party. Its lack of reporting on such matters as the huge expressions of public support Corbyn received, what Corbyn himself was actually saying, what his policies were, and even on such a basic issue relating directly to the central attack on him, what Israel was (and is) doing in Palestine, demonstrated a political partiality which, as this reply to your complaint shows, they have no intention of correcting. The BBC cannot reasonably be described as impartial, or fair, or politically detached. It is an arm of the British political establishment, and as such, should not be trusted.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. The BBC could only begin to justify their ideologically hostile categorisation of Corbyn and democratic socialism if they routinely described Johnson and supporters from his wing of the Tory Party as ‘hard right’ politicians. As far as I’m aware they don’t do this. In reality, the post-Thatcher Tory Party are far more of an ‘extreme’ to and from the post-WWII social democratic consensus than a figure such as Corbyn. If any party should be characterised as ‘hard’ it is surely the current, hard-neo-liberal/right Tory Party?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s